Why Protect Religious Freedom if We Don’t Value Religion?
Alliance Defense Fund fellow Garrett Gibson poses an interesting question on the American paradigm of defending freedom:
There is an oft-repeated American cliche that freedom is not free. Below the surface of this cliche lies three implications: first, that we value freedom; second, that we are willing to pay the price demanded for the protection of freedom; and third, and most pertinent to this discussion, that we protect, with the force of law, the things we value.
Gibson notes the potential cultural implications of society’s move away from recognizing, and valuing, the virtues of religion: Read more