The year 2020 looks to be a promising one, if the momentum of religious liberty in America can be maintained from 2019. The effect of the Trump Administration has been largely positive on religious liberty in the US military, though it has sometimes taken a bit of time for the “new” policy perspective — that is, the constitutional one — to trickle down to action officers.<\/p>\n
Multiple websites noted<\/a> that one of the highlights<\/a> of church\/state issues this year was the ruling on the Bladensburg Cross<\/a> — a Supreme Court ruling that defended the right of the cross to continue to stand. While encouraging, particularly in that it wasn’t a “close” decision, it is notable that two Supreme Court justices thought a cross-shaped memorial built in the early 20th Century violated the US Constitution.<\/p>\n The Manchester VA initially removed a Bible<\/a> from a POW table — but soon returned it, and the fight is now on for the principled defense of religious liberty.<\/p>\n Similarly, Shields of Strength was discriminated against<\/a> due to a complaint from Michael “Mikey” Weinstein — but that action, too, is now being fought.\u00a0 A decade ago, actions like these would be lamented but largely ignored.\u00a0 Now defenders of religious liberty — and military religious freedom — have risen, and they are successful.<\/p>\n Finally, the perennial malcontent Mikey Weinstein ended the year being universally derided and laughed at because he tried to complain about “Jesus candy<\/a>” being sold at military retail stores.\u00a0 For the uninitiated, those were candy canes — Christmas, of course, being the commemoration of Jesus’ birth.\u00a0 Weinstein would have been shocked to learn, no doubt, that just around the corner from that display the store was selling books about Jesus, too — and not just any<\/em> books, but ones saying He was the Messiah and encouraging conversion to the faith.\u00a0 But Bibles are allowed, as are candy canes — and Mikey made himself a laughingstock.<\/p>\n There will always be conflict between the constitutionally-protected religious exercise and those who would seek to undermine it. The question is how the conflict is handled. In the past two years, the US government and its departments have generally become more protective of free exercise and generally less apt to knee-jerk restrict it in response to a random private citizen’s complaint. That is a good thing.<\/p>\n It’s a good thing we need to maintain.<\/p>\n Remember, there’s an election this year.<\/p>\n More to come.<\/p>\n ADVERTISEMENT<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n
\n