{"id":40925,"date":"2017-05-30T00:15:18","date_gmt":"2017-05-30T03:15:18","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/christianfighterpilot.com\/?p=40925"},"modified":"2017-05-30T00:43:22","modified_gmt":"2017-05-30T03:43:22","slug":"update-mikey-weinstein-claims-multiple-muslim-military-wives-assaulted","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/christianfighterpilot.com\/blog\/2017\/05\/30\/update-mikey-weinstein-claims-multiple-muslim-military-wives-assaulted\/","title":{"rendered":"UPDATE: Mikey Weinstein Claims Multiple Muslim Military Wives Assaulted"},"content":{"rendered":"

Michael “Mikey” Weinstein’s ego\u00a0was apparently stung by the now public accusation he was using an old, pre-election story to justify his claims that Donald Trump’s election<\/em> had\u00a0inspired an increase in\u00a0“radical Christians” in the US\u00a0military.\u00a0 On Friday,\u00a0Weinstein went out of his way to directly respond to an article published the day prior\u00a0at the Christian Post<\/a> which highlighted the issue from the Newsweek article<\/a>:<\/p>\n

Weinstein said that there was a more recent incident of a Muslim woman being harassed at a commissary that, while similar to an incident from years earlier, nevertheless happened to a different member of the military.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

That’s fascinating. Over the past 8 years Mikey Weinstein has told only three<\/strong> such stories.\u00a0 All three were military wives<\/strong>.\u00a0 All three were Muslims<\/strong>. All three occurred\u00a0in a military commissary<\/strong>. Two of the three were allegedly surrounded<\/strong> and\u00a0spit on<\/strong>.<\/p>\n

Coincidence?\u00a0 Trend?\u00a0 Fabrication?<\/p>\n

If Weinstein’s stories are true, three is certainly a trend — and two outright assaults is unconscionable. As serious as those events were, surely<\/em> there is some public information: a news article, a public statement from the relevant military commander, a statement from CAIR, a police report, even a statement from Mikey Weinstein at the time of the assault demanding action.<\/p>\n

Yet, Weinstein provides\u00a0nothing<\/em>.\u00a0 There is no public information about these very significant events except Mikey Weinstein’s word.\u00a0 When asked to support his allegations, he said<\/p>\n

He could not disclose too many details about the two incidents due to attorney-client privilege.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

How convenient.<\/p>\n

For those that know him, it is evident Mikey Weinstein has an apparent aversion to the truth. Weinstein has, on more than one occasion<\/em>, claimed<\/a> past<\/strong> incidents were caused by future<\/strong> events. Weinstein has changed significant details of a story<\/a> as the story grew older — apparently to make it more ‘shocking’ and headline-worthy.<\/p>\n

And yet Weinstein responds to questions\u00a0about the unusually coincidental\u00a0— suspicious? — nature of his allegations with ‘sorry, you’ll just have to trust me.’<\/p>\n

You know what that and 25 cents will get you — and, fortunately, so does everyone else who read that ChristianPost article.<\/p>\n

Nice job, Mikey.<\/p>\n

<\/div>\n

ADVERTISEMENT<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

\n