![\"mabus\"](\"http:\/\/christianfighterpilot.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/mabus.jpg\")
<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
What used to be taboo has now become widely accepted by the Defense Department.
\n– Airman 1st Class Kristan Campbell<\/a>, 432nd Wing\/432nd Air Expeditionary Wing<\/p><\/blockquote>\nSecretary of the Navy Ray Mabus oversees the entire US Navy. He recently lauded the Department of Defense’s diversity — by seeming to denigrate<\/em> a “diverse” view held by many US Sailors and their fellow troops.<\/p>\n
During the Pentagon’s celebration of “LGBT Pride Month<\/a>,” Secretary Mabus gave a speech (video<\/a>) lauding the day.\u00a0 After describing the now-repealed DADT as “morally wrong,” Secretary Mabus seemed to equate those who opposed DADT repeal — that is, a large portion of religious American citizens and US troops — with racists and bigots [emphasis added]:<\/p>\n
Throughout this debate…those opposing the repeal<\/strong> of Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell used exactly the same <\/strong>flawed logic as those who had earlier opposed racial integration<\/strong> or gender integration…<\/p>\n
That’s a suggestion that is not only an insult to the professionalism of our armed forces, but it undermines our core values<\/strong> as service men and women and as Americans<\/strong>.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
This is not an insignificant statement. The US military is only five years separated from allowing homosexuals to openly serve — meaning many who opposed repeal, for religious and other reasons,\u00a0may yet still be serving.\u00a0 Those are the same troops who were told they would not be required to change their beliefs about homosexuality, and that they could still express those beliefs without reprisal.<\/p>\n
Remember, the military’s report on\u00a0DADT repeal<\/a> said nearly a full third<\/strong> <\/em>of the US military — including about half<\/em><\/strong> of the US Marine Corps, which Secretary Mabus directly oversees — outright believed repeal would be a bad<\/em> thing<\/strong>.<\/p>\n
Does the Secretary of the Navy believe\u00a0all<\/em> of these Airmen, Soldiers, Marines and Sailors are no better than racists or\u00a0bigots?<\/p>\n
What are his subordinates who have moral or religious objections\u00a0to homosexuality to think now that the leader of their entire Service\u00a0seemed to declare parts of their religious beliefs immoral and bigoted?<\/p>\n
Intentionally or not, the message appears to be\u00a0that\u00a0opposition to the acceptance of homosexuality, however religiously or morally sincere, is not<\/em> an acceptable belief system.\u00a0In fact, not only is opposition unacceptable, but support<\/em> is expected — as when Vice President Joseph Biden gave praise by-name<\/a> to a West Point cadet during their graduation ceremony, highlighting that the cadet was homosexual<\/em>.<\/p>\n
To be clear, the military hasn’t cited any\u00a0problems with the conduct<\/em>\u00a0of those who oppose\u00a0acceptance of homosexuality.\u00a0 Rather, it seems\u00a0mere\u00a0beliefs<\/em> that, say,\u00a0call homosexual behavior a sin\u00a0are little different than the beliefs\u00a0held by those who look down on racial minorities.<\/p>\n
This characterization, should it be official policy,\u00a0has serious implications.\u00a0 For example,\u00a0the US military categorizes groups that advocate “racial intolerance” as “extremist” — and severely restricts the ability of US troops to participate in those groups. (See, for example, DoDI 1325.06<\/a>\u00a0on “Prohibited Activities”.)<\/p>\n
If opposition to the acceptance and promotion of homosexuality is no different than racism, will the US military soon categorize churches, mosques, and synagogues that preach against homosexuality as “extremist” and restrict US troops from participating in those “groups”?<\/p>\n
If during this month of “pride”\u00a0the US military is supposed to reaffirm, as\u00a0President Obama said, “belief in the\u00a0dignity of all<\/strong> Americans<\/a>,” where has the US military reaffirmed the dignity of those who, consistent with their constitutionally-protected religious beliefs,\u00a0do not<\/em> agree with the promotion of homosexual behavior?<\/p>\n
Or is their<\/em> diversity of thought,\u00a0culture, and belief unworthy of respect and dignity?<\/p>\n
Secretary of the Air Force Deborah Lee James weighed in on the topic as well, saying\u00a0(video<\/a>):<\/p>\n
In fact, we now depend<\/em> on diversity of thought, background, and culture.\u00a0 The things that make us unique are the same things that make us strong.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
As both Secretaries\u00a0said, the US military claims it values diversity<\/strong>.<\/p>\n
Some might think, though, that when it comes to religion<\/strong> and sexual behavior<\/strong>, certain kinds of diversity are more valued than others.<\/p>\n
Also at FRC<\/a>, CNS<\/a>, OneNewsNow<\/a>, Stars and Stripes<\/a>, Navy.mil<\/a>, with more celebrations at the Eisenhower<\/a> and USAFA cadets on NBC News<\/a>, <\/span><\/p>\n
<\/div>\nADVERTISEMENT<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n
\n