I hate to burst your persecution bubble, JD, but I don’t see any problem with that clearly marked chaplain’s vehicle having a sign like that on it. If it was on a commander’s or an NCO’s vehicle it would be an issue, but not on what is clearly a chaplain’s vehicle. A chaplain’s vehicle in a combat zone would really be looked at as their rolling chapel office, and a sign at a chapel office saying to go to church wouldn’t be an issue. If any other officer or an NCO had a sign like that in their office or someone put it on a non-chapel building it would be an issue, but a chaplain doing it at a chapel isn’t. I think that same rule would apply to a chaplain’s vehicle like the one in that photo.
No offense intended, but its not all about you, you know.
a chaplain doing it at a chapel isn’t…
Excellent. Does that mean you are disavowing the MRFF position that it is a “Constitutional violation” for a Christian chaplain to preach a Christian sermon in a chapel service for Christian troops?
I hate to burst your persecution bubble, JD, but I don’t see any problem with that clearly marked chaplain’s vehicle having a sign like that on it. If it was on a commander’s or an NCO’s vehicle it would be an issue, but not on what is clearly a chaplain’s vehicle. A chaplain’s vehicle in a combat zone would really be looked at as their rolling chapel office, and a sign at a chapel office saying to go to church wouldn’t be an issue. If any other officer or an NCO had a sign like that in their office or someone put it on a non-chapel building it would be an issue, but a chaplain doing it at a chapel isn’t. I think that same rule would apply to a chaplain’s vehicle like the one in that photo.
@Chris Rodda
No offense intended, but its not all about you, you know.
Excellent. Does that mean you are disavowing the MRFF position that it is a “Constitutional violation” for a Christian chaplain to preach a Christian sermon in a chapel service for Christian troops?
Take your time.