21 Jan 2007
The day slipped
by so quietly that few seem to know that it even exists. It did
not receive any mainstream media coverage, probably because
there were no lawsuits or other controversies surrounding it.
Still, on January 16, 2007, President George Bush followed the
precedent of Clinton and the former Bush by proclaiming
"Religious Freedom Day." (The day was created by Congress in
1993; they requested that the President issue a proclamation.)
As noted in
the Religious Freedom Day
guidebook, available from the Religious Freedom Day
website, the 16th of January is the anniversary of the 1786
passage of the Virginia Statute on Religious Freedom, originally
authored by Thomas Jefferson. [The private website is sponsored
by
Gateways to Better Education, which is an organization
"dedicated to helping public schools teach Judeo-Christian
history, thought, and values."] The statute, which was intended
to protect people against religious discrimination and eliminate
a tax to support clergy, would eventually be reflected in the
First Amendment to the Constitution of the United States.
In his
proclamation, the President said,
I call on all
Americans to reflect on the great blessing of religious liberty,
endeavor to preserve this freedom for future generations, and
commemorate this day with appropriate events and activities in
their schools, places of worship, neighborhoods, and homes.
Though
announced by the President and at the heart of the continuing
religious debate in America, Religious Freedom Day may have
received little public press because rather than backing the in
vogue "wall" between religion and government, it actually
quietly supports the opposite.
Proponents of
"the wall" include Americans United for the Separation of Church
and State, an organization that "protects religious liberty" by
"protecting the separation of church and state." The AU has
garnered a reputation for agitating people in civil service who
would profess an exclusive faith—including Armed Forces
members—claiming in many cases that doing so unconstitutionally
entangles government and religion or even 'establishes' a
religion. The AU holds Jefferson up as its veritable
figurehead for his letter to the Danbury Baptists that
originated the phrase "wall of separation between church and
state" (January 1, 1802). Though Jefferson's supposed politics
are their foundation, the AU, too, said nothing of the
significance of the day until they wrote a cursory blog on the
day it
occurred.
In their blog
the AU noted that "scholars agree that the Virginia Statute had
a profound effect on the religious liberty clauses of the First
Amendment and the course of church-state relations in America."
Ironically, and perhaps accidentally, the AU quoted part of the
statute that intended to protect freedom of religious expression
for government officials:
All men
shall be free to profess, and by argument to maintain,
their opinion in matters of religion, and the same shall in
no wise diminish, enlarge, or affect their civil
capacities. [emphasis added]
Contrary to
the claim the AU often makes, Jefferson did not envision a
society where civil servants were prohibited from having,
professing, or advocating a faith. In fact, Jefferson himself
began the celebrated "separation" statute with the atheistically
and evolutionally insensitive phrase, "Whereas Almighty God hath
created the mind free..." and, with a pluralistically
inconsiderate phrase, indicated that God was the "Holy Author of
our religion" [emphasis added]. Jefferson understood
that religion was not to be excluded from government;
rather, government was to be inclusive of religion.
Some have
asserted that a professed faith detracts from a person's ability
to serve in a 'secular' government or even disqualifies them for
leadership, particularly when applied to the military.
Jefferson said that very concept was a violation of a person's
natural rights:
Our civil rights have no
dependence on our religious opinions any more than our opinions
in physics or geometry; therefore proscribing any citizen as
unworthy of the public confidence by laying upon him an
incapacity of being called to offices of trust and emolument,
unless he profess or renounce this or that religious
opinion, is depriving him injuriously of those privileges and
advantages to which in common with his fellow-citizens he has a
natural right. [emphasis added]
It was not
Jefferson's original intent that an elected official be
prevented from swearing-in on a Koran. Likewise, it was not his
intent that people in government service have their religious
beliefs silenced in order to keep their religion and their civil
service separate. There should be (and is no) 'religious test'
for public office, either positive or negative. Jefferson
envisioned an environment in which people were free to profess
their religious opinions—whatever they were—and the fact that
they had made such a profession should not detract from or
otherwise affect their contributions to government service.
The greatest
concern in Jefferson's time was a return to the English model of
government supervision of religion. The Virginia Statute was
written to address the concerns of those who had to pay to
support clergy with whom they had moral
disagreements—reminiscent of the British church system. The
letter to the Danbury Baptists—upon which much of the current
religious liberty discussion is based—was written not to assert
that religion must stay out of government, but to reassure
Connecticut Baptists that the government would not interfere
with their religious liberties. [The Danbury Baptist
Association had expressed concern that religious liberties were
a "government favor" rather than an "inalienable right."
Jefferson assured them that the First Amendment guaranteed that
the government would not impede on their religious liberties.
Both letters can be viewed on this open
source.]
Some
self-proclaimed "protectors" of religious liberty seem to think
that citizens have a right to be protected from exposure to
potentially offensive faiths. Jefferson did not intend to
implicate an inalienable right to freedom from religion.
Those that would seek to silence religious expression in public
should take note, that, as Jefferson said, "truth is great and
will prevail if left to herself.... [She] has nothing to
fear…unless by human interposition [she is] disarmed of her
natural weapons, free argument and debate...." Free argument
and open debate—even on religious topics—are not the enemy of
democracy. They are its foundation.
Religious
Freedom Day presents an opportunity to remind people that
religious liberties are at the heart of the American culture, as
noted in the Virginia Statute on Religious Freedom authored by
Thomas Jefferson. Jefferson indicated that our religious
freedoms are natural rights and basic civil liberties.
President Bush declared that we "reject religious bigotry in
every form," which includes bigotry against religion in
general. Instead, he says we should "maintain the vitality of a
pluralistic society," or one in which numerous distinct groups
are present and tolerated. No faith should be elevated, but
neither should a faith be denigrated. Eliminating the ability
of public officials, including military servicemembers, to have
public sectarian religious expression is inconsistent with
Jefferson's founding intent, the Constitution, and basic civil
liberties. Disagree though we may with the tenets of another's
faith (or lack thereof), we should endeavor to preserve the
freedom we have as Americans to possess and profess our
religious beliefs. Remembering Religious Freedom Day may be
more important than we realize.
|