Book Review: Under Orders

William McCoy
edein, 2007.
Topic: Spirituality

Under Orders is subtitled “A Spiritual Handbook for Military Personnel,” has a rare endorsement from active duty General Petraeus, and is written by an experienced chaplain. It has exemplary reviews on various websites. It seems like an excellent reference for a military Christian.

It’s not.

The book’s intended audience are those who are non-religious, non-church-going, depressed, or traumatized. Nothing is said to those who already have a spiritual faith.

Chaplain McCoy, who is sponsored by the Lutheran denomination, doesn’t speak confidently about his own faith. In fact, he has little positive to say about the Christian faith at all. He belittles fellow Christians with side comments about evangelical “hurdles,” “rules,” and “righteousness.” The Chaplain advocates spirituality above Christianity, as if something is better than nothing, and explicitly states that there are “alternative” ways to God:

  • “It is important for you to believe in a god.” (p78)
  • “It will be your decision as to whether you want to be religious as a Catholic, a Buddhist, or a Methodist.” (p57)
  • “Your convictions are just as good as the next person’s convictions.” (p86)

In so doing, the Chaplain undermines the legitimacy of his own faith by actively supporting views that are inconsistent with Christianity. To the Chaplain, Christianity is just one more world religion. The “Gospel”–always capitalized but never explained–is an abstract secret ingredient that “is meant to give you a word of hope.” (p207) More importantly, he holds a decidedly unChristian view of one of the central tenets of Christianity:

Christ came into the world so that people could be saved from “being redundant and meaningless, that people might have lives of significance and meaning rather than emptiness and sorrow.” (p211)

With regard to “spiritual” living, ostensibly one primary purpose of a “spiritual handbook,” his advice is infrequent, vague, and self-centric.

“Living a life of worshipping God is not about you becoming like someone who carries a Bible in your [unit]. Its about you feeling at ease…” (p208)

He gives no advice on how to live a life of faith in the military; rather, he “encourages” people to persevere until they can leave the military. When challenged, rather than encouraging people to make the hard choices in accordance with the tenets of their faith, the Chaplain suggests they search for a religion that fits their lifestyle.

“If my theology doesn’t integrate how I interact with people then I should drop it and begin searching for one that does.” (p106)

Less importantly, the book is also rife with less than stellar grammar and formatting. (It appears to be self-published and poorly edited.) There are unsupported theses, redundant sentences, and dozens of unexplained (and irrelevant) pop culture references. There is even a simple Bible story retold with basic errors. Such faults may be overlooked if there are other redeeming qualities; they compound the negatives of a book that does not.

It is possible to argue that it is appropriate for a military Chaplain to write a “non-sectarian” book, or one that promotes no particular religion. This can be done, though, without compromising one’s own faith or proposing the validity of the truth claims in all.

Not recommended. This book is not addressed to Christians, and it is written by a Christian Chaplain who undermines not only his own faith, but also that of his readers. This “spiritual handbook” provides no spiritual guidance for military Christians.

This book is available from Amazon. (This site is an Amazon Associate and may earn from qualifying purchases made through Amazon referrals.)

ADVERTISEMENT



3 comments

  • I think you ought to be a bit more broad-minded about what constitutes a Christian. Identifying Christianity with one particular sect (as fundamentalists and other “conservative evangelicals” are wont to do) is not fair to the vast majority of Christians who don’t hold to those tenets.

  • The assumption that the best-selling “Under Orders” was meant for Christians is a false start anyway. I wrote UO for soldiers, sailors, airmen and marines, so that they might have a resource for faith. Indeed, I believe that if one’s faith is true and valid that it will stand the scrutiny of intellectual examination. I am not ashamed nor afraid of my faith but that does not mean that in this reviewer’s terms I should “tell people how to believe.” That is the epitome of religious arrogance. On the other hand it is “the goodness of God which leads men to repentance.” Oh I could wax theological but I reserve that for the pulpit. For here I suggest that the FighterPilot keep his mind on his heads up display where I suppose his expertise is better applied.

  • Lt Col David Sutton

    Chaplain McCoy’s response is disappointing at best. This site’s review focused on some glaring problems with theology, consistency, and quality, which are no small matters for any book, to say nothing of one purported to be offering spiritual guidance (whatever the intended audience). The Chaplain’s answer – essentially “why don’t you stick to flying, fighter-boy” is unworthy of any serious writer and even more so from a purported minister of the gospel. Postmodernism’s individual spirituality has failed and will continue to fail to bring any real help to anyone – much less to men & women in a life and death profession such as ours. It is a shame that one who names the Name of the One with true answer and true hope would offer such misguidance. It is equally a shame that he is unwilling to give more of a defense for this than the usual shouting down that is to me more expected from the likes of the MRFF. Rom 1:16…